Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is an apple, it starts with an r?:
What is 5 plus 5?:
Which Dakota has the city of Fargo:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Sal Atticum
« on: March 25, 2014, 05:04:32 PM »

Regarding the oil boom going on, I think we know how people will act...
Not sure what you mean?  Pro-science or anti-science?  I can't believe we're even having this discussion.
Posted by: Popperoni
« on: September 26, 2013, 01:18:28 PM »

Regarding the oil boom going on, I think we know how people will act...
Posted by: Sal Atticum
« on: January 17, 2013, 07:23:07 AM »

What would you have us do instead?  Let bleeding heart liberals tell us which parts of science to listen to?
I think you're a little over the top (or maybe trying to troll me). 

Look: science is good stuff, but there are lots of different and conflicting results you can get, all of them factually correct.  Should we do what is possible (because science tells us so), or should we make sure we know the implications of our actions first?
Posted by: roto_rooter
« on: January 16, 2013, 09:09:24 AM »

What would you have us do instead?  Let bleeding heart liberals tell us which parts of science to listen to?
Posted by: Sal Atticum
« on: January 15, 2013, 07:10:02 AM »

http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/253838/group/Opinion/

This article seems to be saying "bet on science, but only when it tells us things we like."
anything
realistic