Author Topic: An Internet Blacklist!  (Read 3360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pmp6nl

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5621
  • Karma: 113
  • Gender: Male
    • Campus Dakota.com
An Internet Blacklist!
« on: January 13, 2011, 11:17:17 AM »
From http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/coica




COICA Fact Sheet

What bill are we talking about?

It's S. 3804, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA), introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT). It's currently being considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

What exactly does it do?

The bill creates a blacklists of Internet domain names which the Attorney General can add to with a court order. Internet service providers, financial transaction providers, and online ad vendors (everyone from Comcast to PayPal to Google AdSense) would be required to block any domains on the list.
(The bill used to also have a second list that the AG could add to without a court order, but public pressure has gotten it removed.)

What kind of domains can go on the list?

The list is for domains "dedicated to infringing activity," which is defined very broadly — any site where counterfeit goods or copyrighted material are "central to the activity of the Internet site" would be blocked.

What's so bad about that?

Well, it means sites like YouTube could get censored in the US. Copyright holders like Viacom argue that copyrighted material is central to activity of YouTube. But under current US law, YouTube is perfectly legal as long as they take down copyrighted material when they're informed about it -- which is why Viacom lost their case in court. If this bill passes, Viacom doesn't even need to prove YouTube is doing anything illegal -- as long as they can persuade a court that enough other people are using it for copyright infringement, that's enough to get the whole site censored.

Isn't the word censored a little overheated?

Not at all. In the US, the way things work is that if you're using the Internet to do something illegal, you're brought to court and the courts can shut you down. This bill would bypass that whole system by forcing Internet service providers to block access to sites that are otherwise up. People in other countries could still get to them, but Internet users in the US would be blocked. This kind of Internet censorship is exactly the sort of thing the US government has been criticizing China and Iran for -- just the other day, Obama told the UN that "We will support a free and open Internet." Now it turns out we're going to start censoring the Internet ourselves.

But it's just limited to copyright!

How long do you think that will last? Once the Attorney General has a system set up for censoring the Internet, everyone who has a problem with a website will want to get in on it. How long before it's expanded to block Wikileaks, pornography, gambling, anarchists, supposed terrorists, and anybody else the Attorney General doesn't like that day? If people are doing something illegal, the government should take them to court and shut them down -- not try to bypass due process by blocking their domain name.

Won't Internet users just work around the blacklist?

Yes -- at the cost of a major blow to the United States. Currently the United States is the global hub of Internet traffic, but if this law passes Internet traffic will be reconfigured to route around it. Companies will move their US servers and domain names overseas, Internet users will route their traffic through other countries (just like Chinese citizens have to do now!), and software will have to be reconfigured to no longer trust answers from American servers.

What can I do to stop this?

The first step is signing our petition then we'll give you the tools to share it with your friends and call your senator.
If you're interested in doing more than that, please send us an email and tell us what you'd be willing to help out with. Thanks!

What if I have more questions?

Just send us an email.





What do you think, is this something that is threatening our internet?
CampusDakota.com

Offline Sal Atticum

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 7121
  • Karma: 38
  • Gender: Male
    • Campus Dakota
Re: An Internet Blacklist!
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2011, 11:54:13 AM »
It's interesting to me that Pat Leahy is sponsoring this bill, although (as you can see) there seems to be some form of bipartisan support since Orrin Hatch is co-sponsoring.  And people say that Democrats and Republicans can't work together.

I agree that this bill is against whatever the Internet is about.  When we support Google for refusing to censor search results in China but would hand over control over what servers Americans can access to the Attorney General (who probably already has enough on his or her plate), it's definitely a mixed message.

I was under the impression that copyright infringement was a civil matter, not a criminal one, in which case I don't understand why we need this bill.  The current practice is to go after the server/individual/etc. for specific pieces of content, not allow one company to get a court order to shut down access to a whole domain just because they have one or two pieces of content which they are claiming they were infringed upon.  YouTube is a great example, but what about the professor who posts an article PDF for his or her class to read--is Elsevier going to shut down UND.edu?

I don't think such a law would protect anyone.
JUST EXTRA POLISH. I DO SOME WORK WITH EXCELL SO I KEEP THE CAPS LOCK ON :-P

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is an apple, it starts with an r?:
What is 5 plus 5?:
Which Dakota has the city of Fargo:

realistic