Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color is an apple, it starts with an r?:
What is 5 plus 5?:
Which Dakota has the city of Fargo:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: pmp6nl
« on: February 17, 2008, 07:55:16 PM »

He wants VP?
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar
« on: February 17, 2008, 07:53:23 PM »

I guess you have a point.

So why's Mitt endorsing McCain?
Posted by: pmp6nl
« on: February 13, 2008, 05:34:55 PM »

Shouldn't we talk about something a little more recent?  Like how Obama and McCain just won three primaries each?

Yes Mr. I dug this older topic up.
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar
« on: February 13, 2008, 07:59:23 AM »

Shouldn't we talk about something a little more recent?  Like how Obama and McCain just won three primaries each?
Posted by: pmp6nl
« on: February 12, 2008, 10:09:10 AM »

Damn Iowans and their silly dancing to pick candidates.

Dont be mad that Iowa is so influential
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar
« on: February 12, 2008, 10:02:30 AM »

Damn Iowans and their silly dancing to pick candidates.
Posted by: pmp6nl
« on: January 28, 2008, 08:50:38 PM »

Iowa is the place to be ;)

They do have a lot of power, how did this process get started?
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar
« on: January 28, 2008, 09:14:12 AM »

I don't understand it being an "upset."  We've had one caucus and one primary.  Whoopee.  If these states get so much weight on who gets to be president, why don't we just let Iowa and New Hampshire decide the whole thing right now and not waste the rest of the year on the rest of the country?



Because we don't like Iowa and New Hampshire?

I think the system is a little out of whack.  It's disappointing that so few states have real power, but the race this year seems like it will be an interesting on.
Posted by: JakeJZG
« on: January 27, 2008, 06:44:31 PM »

DECIDER
Posted by: pmp6nl
« on: January 20, 2008, 01:36:09 PM »

Well being form Iowa I thought you were the Deciders (R)(C)(TM).

Hehe, I never made that claim
Posted by: JakeJZG
« on: January 20, 2008, 12:42:46 AM »

Well being form Iowa I thought you were the Deciders (R)(C)(TM).
Posted by: pmp6nl
« on: January 10, 2008, 08:19:35 PM »

I never understood the process very well anyway; and I am from Iowa.
Posted by: red hibiscus
« on: January 09, 2008, 02:19:15 PM »

I agree!

Plus, I don't understand why the political commentators were so baffled that the results differed from what the polls predicted. It's not a perfect system, geniuses...
Posted by: JakeJZG
« on: January 09, 2008, 10:17:09 AM »

We still have a year.

A year.
Posted by: Sal Atticum
« on: January 09, 2008, 09:14:54 AM »

I don't understand it being an "upset."  We've had one caucus and one primary.  Whoopee.  If these states get so much weight on who gets to be president, why don't we just let Iowa and New Hampshire decide the whole thing right now and not waste the rest of the year on the rest of the country?

anything
realistic
anything